What to Go With? An ICO (Initial "Current" Offering) OR an IPO (Initial "Pre-Historic" Offering)


L & # 39; introduction:

INITIAL PUBLIC OFFER: IPOs have a very old and interesting beginning. An IPO is an invitation concept to public investment for a company when it launches public broadcasts. This apparently makes the company a "limited" company and opens the door for ownership and profit sharing for people who are not "actively" involved in the company's operations. These "shareholders" are generally not decision-makers and are only shareholders or companies. They are neither employees nor sponsored by the company. They could get benefits by securing the stock longer and waiting for the exponential growth of the cost of the shares, but they could also go in the opposite direction if the calculations do not match the plan.

INITIAL OFFER OF PARTS: ICO, however, is rather an advanced version of an IPO, several issues are solved and removed, the boundaries between practical and materialistic objects as well as planning have been outdated and the projects introduced have been targeted. This is the "crowdfunding", focusing on "cryptocurrency", which is used as a capital for startups. These young companies are mostly owned and operated by young people, who have new and innovative ideas for the company. Before or after the "tokens" become "coins" and arrive at the exchange, many procedures must be followed. People who buy tokens can sell the bets at any time, even before the "exchange" phase. After the "token" comes to exchange and becomes a "coin", it is free of the introducer and comes completely to the "request and offer" roller coaster ".

History: The similarities and differences: there are several similarities, but also significant differences in the comparison between IPO and ICO. Historical evidence could be analyzed and studied for a better understanding of the relativity, requirements and longevity of the practical aspect of both, in the economic and technical world of today.

Initial public offer:

The first IPO was introduced during the reign of the Roman Republic (509 BC – 27 BC) when Publicani, were independent legal entities, whose property was divided between shares (shares). These parts were obviously sold to public investors and it was an open market, with fluctuating prices. There were spectators and this is not very different from the current scenario of stock markets that we can see these days. The existence and importance of Publicani were lost after the birth of the Roman Empire in 27 BC. It was the same for the oldest scholarship.

The first "modern IPO" took place in 1602, when the VOC (Dutch East India Company) opened a public offering for the company to raise funds. The Dutch East India Company raised funds for the expansion of global activities and the establishment of settlements in different parts of the world. The public was part of the company and was offered profits with the growth of the company. VOC has become the first company to introduce stocks and bonds to the general public. Thus, VOC could officially be considered the very first company to be listed on the stock market.

In the United States, around the same time, the initial public offering was the IPO of the Bank of North America. This private bank was adopted by the Confederation Congress in May 1781 and opened in Philadelphia on January 7, 1782. The first Bank Of North America IPO was launched in 1783.

Initial offer of parts:

Mastercoin launched the first chip sale or "initial offer of coins" in July 2013. It launched the trend to accept legal tender (government approved currency) or exchangeable coins to buy a token.

ETHEREUM raised funds in 2014 through a symbolic sale from a collection of 3,700 bitcoins in the first 12 hours, which was $ 2.3 million at that time.

Karmacoin launched a symbolic sale in April 2014 for the Karmashare project.

However, the trend began in 2017, when ICOs and token sales became popular and the numbers for listings, announcements and token sales were significant until July 2017.

Now, since this is something recently introduced that has not been followed (significantly) by many, it does not have a long story to tell. Nevertheless, given the popularity and growth of this phenomenon for less than 10 years, it has made it an inevitable chain of events.

It has recently attracted the attention and interest of not only young people with innovative ideas and startup projects, but also well-established names and successful businesses around the world. One of the most relevant foundations for launching a symbolic sale or offering a coin is the way you correct it with the future plan, and the way you represent it with the vision, which could be shared and felt by the general public.

As much as one could generalize the concept behind the coin and make it connected to as many "types" of people, the greater the likelihood of it happening, the harder the hard cap will be hit earlier. (The cap is the maximum number of chips to be dealt during an ICO).

Marketing differences, traditional similarities:

Although the two are different in terms of business creation, public participation, and likely "types" of people interested in one or the other, they have many traditional similarities.

1) "NATURAL" people, financially progressive, aware of market trends and willing to take advantage of the cost of risk-taking, are the "interested" people who engage in IPOs or IPOs. ICO.

2) Open to everyone, both present and create no restrictions, when it is investment, for people. IPOs, however, lack the leverage that ICOs could obtain for foreign customers.

3) A "PROSPECTUS" in an IPO, describing share ownership, mutual fund forecasts, company projects and the vision of IPOs, becomes a "WHITE BOOK" in an ICO, describing the specifications of the ICO, the unique outlets of the announcements and initial plans of the ICO and the advanced road map for the entire period of the ICO.

4) Shares or bonds can be bought or sold at any time. There is no activity related to the time / person that makes it a non-transferable entity. Throughout the IPO, a person could buy it from any other person (if it's not directly from the introducer). This has been a practice at a time, IPO and ICO respectively. In terms of profit, people make purchases / sales internally.

5) An IPO has normally been introduced by an already established company. As a rule, it is not connected or linked to an individual. On the contrary, an ICO is introduced by a single person or leader. Marketing, building trusting relationships and sharing vision occur simultaneously, while the ICO is launched and the ICO period continues.

6) ICOs and IPOs differ in their presentation to the investor community. An IPO must create trust in the product and the associated plans must be shared with a long-term stability factor. The IPO is a fully controlled phenomenon and the introducer remains responsible for the cost and price of the share / bond. On the contrary, in an ICO, as soon as the "token" becomes a "coin", the introducer check is considered to have been made and the price varies depending on the fundamentals of the "demand" and the "price". ;offer".

7) An IPO involves a new project / plan or start-up that has a forward-looking strategy and calculations of the pros and cons, if not considerations and, in the worst case, fail-safe plans for all (or almost). However, there is no reason to predict the launch of an IPO on the market, and IPOs also fail. However, an ICO only collects the capital of another company, which has nothing to do with the purpose of the piece (mainly) and is only used to generate the funds necessary for a company. The introducer can be a young, tech savvy or a little known programmer. Once the token becomes a coin, even investors no longer want to follow it, as they have already benefited from it throughout the ICO period and beyond.


An ICO is the choice of the progressive era, things go fast, no big names, no brand relationships, no long term investment plans and equally anticipated returns. The option of choosing an ICO is definitely a quick and rewarding benefit, provided that you are well informed of the quality of a token 's projections and that you can be certain (even the least) of the price of a chip. future of the fate of the token on the market. Just by giving a little more time to a so-called "geek" next door, you can learn everything about it. Then you can start redefining your fortune.

An IPO is a traditional way of "looking for fruit" in someone else's tree, while you water it when it was a young tree. It is also risky, uncertain and even projections and forecasts could not be well defined. Yet, it is an effective way to make hundreds of millions of millionaires. However, the process is rather slow and this "feeling of fear" remains very long, compared to that of an ICO.

You have to decide for yourself where to go. Given everything, because people still invest in both areas. They become richer. They share their successes with you. Which side would you like to go to now?

Comments are closed.